The core content of recently released companion Provisions aiming to prevent improper interference in the courts and justice system are summarized in the CHART BELOW. The first document is aimed at preventing interference from leading cadres, while the second focuses on interference internal to the judicial organs, including the courts, procuratorates and public security organs. full translations can be found HERE and HERE.
Posts tagged as “司法腐败”
In China the question of whether a person is excused from criminal punishment by reason of mental incapacity is determined by an expert forensic evaluator who is a trained psychiatrist. There are about 2000 forensic psychiatric evaluators for all of China. The defense has no right to request an evaluation or hire his own experts, but may informally as that police, prosecutors or the courts do so. Their evaluation is rarely challenged, and many persons found 'criminally insane' will simply be released to their families. I guess, it's clear why one would want to bribe them
http://magazine.caijing.com.cn/2013-05-26/112826999.html ________________________________ 本文来源于《财经》杂志 2013年05月26日 15:1 法官腐败并非单纯的道德和监督问题，200个样本组[……] Read more
单位给涉嫌犯罪下属出公函请求轻判事件时有发生 专家称 “公函求情”干扰司法审判应立法追责 稿件来源: 法制日报—— 发布时间：2013-06-14 06: 中国政法大学副校长 [……] Read more